Sting Operations
By Sr P. Michelle Mathias
A Sting operation is an operation implemented by undercover investigators in a
covert manner to apprehend a person committing a crime through hidden or
clandestine ways or through means of deception. Sting operations has led to
many big-time criminals being caught red-handed. In some other cases, those
doing undercover agent jobs have also lost their lives.
Sting
operations are often accompanied by agents using false identities, hidden
cameras in pens or buttons on clothes or in purses, etc.
The
very nature of a sting operation is deception. A criminal is caught or proof is
sought using deceptive means or pseudo identities. The intention of doing good
using a sting is foreshadowed by deceptive means to achieve the goal, which is
why, Sting operations often create an ethical and moral dilemma.
In
India, there are two diverse opinions. In the article titled, ‘Are sting
operations legal and moral’ by Vappala Balachandran for outlookindia.com
(2019), she writes that in India, a
lawyer by name R.K.Anand was found guilty in connection with an expose case
through a sting operation in July 2009. The Supreme court declared him guilty
of criminal contempt. On the other hand, in another case in India, in April 2014,
the Supreme court declared that Sting operations were not a legal method of law
enforcement. The Court was of the opinion that perhaps the victim who could be
otherwise innocent of a crime, lured into doing the crime by others. In the
Unites States of America however, law is favourable towards sting operations as
viable means of crime prevention.
The
Supreme Court’s verdict has truth in it. There are many cases, wherein Sting
operations have exposed criminal conspiracies, money rackets and bribery. However,
there are also undercover investigators who do sting operations in order to
derive sensational news and invade the privacy of citizens. This is an uncalled
for act of deception. Given these happenings, Sting operations are categorised
into two types. They are Positive Sting Operations and Negative Sting
Operations.
Positive Sting Operations:
A
Positive Sting operation does benefit to society by exposing the truth and
eventually leading to the path of justice. For instance, the latest sting
operations by Cobrapost, a non-profit news website that is known for its
investigative journalism venture showed how around 36 Bollywood celebrities
were willing to opine in favour of Political parties on their social networking
platforms which have huge followership for huge sums of money.
In
another sting operation called Operation 136, they exposed many leading
corporate News channels and Newspaper owners were willing to compromise with
content, introduce communal content and speak on an issue for a price. This
amount was huge. It was a serious piece of good sting operation.
Journalism
is the fourth Pillar of the Indian Society. This pillar is to lead the way.
However, the need for monetary gains has led most of them to compromise with
the content. This is injustice to the millions of readers who watch these
channels or read these newspapers as authentic sources of Information. Sting
Operations like those done by Cobrapost are beneficial to the citizens of the
country who deserve to know the truth.
Negative
Sting Operations:
A
negative Sting Operation does harm to Society and particularly to the
individual whose name gets dragged into controversy. There are cases where TV
channels have gone to extremes to gain mileage by using Sting Operations for
sensationalised Journalism.
For
instance, In India there was the case of a teacher named Uma Khurana, who was
allegedly “exposed” by a TV channel named ‘Live India’ for a sex racket which
she ran by luring her pupils. Yogendra Aldak in his article, ‘Sting
Operation-to be or not to be in India’ on legalserviceindia.com writes that this
accusation turned out to be totally false and The Delhi High Court issued
notices to the Delhi Government and City Police after taking suo motu
cognisance of media reports alleging that a sting operation carried out by a TV
channel. The poor teacher had a threat to life and was totally robbed of her
dignity. This was a grave harm done to her by the TV channel and the State and
Police who permitted this to happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment