Monday, 30 December 2019

Play Theory by William Stephenson



Play Theory by William Stephenson


William Stephenson published the ‘Play Theory of Mass Communication’ in 1967 wherein he pointed out that one of the significant functions of Mass Communication is to provide people pleasure, in other words a “Subjective Play”, which provided an interlude from the pressing matters that concerned them.   

While, most studies in this field had been focusing on the factual and sociological perspectives, he channelised his contribution based on the subjective and the Psychological aspects involved in the use of Mass Communication.

Arthur Asa Berger in his book, ‘Essentials of Mass Communication Theory’, writes Stephenson sees mass communication as serving two functions. While the first one is to provide play, to influence customs, normalize manners, give people something in common to talk about, so as to foster mutual socialization. 

Stephenson highlights that most studies have been always aimed at pointing out that behind Mass communication was always this “lurking of “hidden persuasion” and tyranny over the mind” (a view expressed by Aldous Huxley)”; He differs from it and points out that Mass Communication can also be chosen by a Media Recipient for the reasons of play, i.e., entertainment and a bit of Socialisation. This entertainment which provided for pleasure and play was an end in itself. Stephenson believed that not every media content consumed by the audience of media took a toll on their behaviour or drastically impacted their lives. Certain media was watched for the purpose of play.  

Arthur Asa Berger further writes that, "In the words of Stephenson, the other purpose of Mass communication is to “rock the boat,” to be in the forefront of change in status quo conditions. The press, traditionally has served revolution and revolt. It is important to notice that it is difficult to change basic beliefs, though in a revolution that is perhaps exactly what happens willy-nilly. It takes a cataclysmic event, however, to bring this about. The achievement of Mass communication lies in the way it short-circuits older beliefs, substituting new values for them." (Stephenson, 1967/ 1988, p.65)

The above theory was criticised as it lacked a working model. Stephenson’s understanding that media provided ‘subjective play’ and contributed to ‘Self Enhancement’ was sceptically viewed by many scholars. 

Julian Kücklich in her article, ‘Play and Playability as Key Concepts in New Media Studies’ writes that According to Stephenson, communication pleasure leads to a 'self-enhancement' that seems to be akin to a form of catharsis. But ultimately, Stephenson fails to explain why news-reading is pleasurable even when one reads 'bad news'; and he does not arrive at a working model of play in mass communication. Although he comes to the conclusion that "the communication situation is not one in which information is passed from a communication source to a receiver; it is one in which the individual plays with communication", he fails to come up with convincing examples. [1] 


[1] Julian Kücklich, Play and Playability as Key Concepts in New Media Studies, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.94.4169&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Wednesday, 10 April 2019

Rural Journalism - Notes for BJMC


Rural Journalism in the Indian context


The term ‘Rural Journalism’ is basically meant to define journalism that addresses issues in the rural pockets of India. These issues include coverage of rural news that deals with farmers, tribals, the economically backward in rural areas, agrarian issues both good and those that need to be addressed, agrarian crisis, socio-economic inequalities that exist in rural India, issues that deal with industrialisation that deprives people of their land and their basic rights in the rural pockets, etc,. Rural reports by journalists can contribute massively to development of Indian rural areas and can lead to Governments taking notice of the situation and reaching out with helps to these pockets.

A very ideal example is that which was given in the Hindu 'Business line' online paper wherein a story is mentioned about Basheer Ahmed Peer. The article says, “Rural reporting had the same kind of effect yet again when young writer Basheer Ahmed Peer drew the attention of the world to the harrowing experience of the people of Shumaryal village in Kupwara who were daily forced to cross a makeshift bridge of tree logs and wooden planks. During floods, crossing this bridge became that much riskier for school-going children, as well as the elderly population. Peer’s story spurred the State government to build a proper bridge, making life so much easier for the villagers.”[1] This was the effect of Rural Reporting. Journalism can work wonders if it begins to stand for the rights of the people.

The same article further states the benefits of Rural journalism by saying that “Other rural reports have also led to schools and toilets being constructed where there was none. Widows who were reduced to begging have got their pension and supply of medicines to a remote public health centre in Salotree, in Poonch, was restored. At Manghar village of Poonch district, where many lives were lost due to lack of transport, Bashart ul Haque’s article fetched an ambulance service to the region. That’s the kind of empowerment rural journalism is making possible.”[2]

Alternative media and Rural Journalism


Another sign of hope for Rural Journalism is of certain alternative media like Khabar Lahariya, Janavani, Gaon Connection, PARI are striving to serve the purpose of rural journalism in India. These are all medias that cater to Rural journalism at the grassroots level. 

Khabar Lahariya identifies itself solely as a rural media. It highlights the fact that it provides of those news stories and reports which are not highlighted by mainstream news channels. It does the hardcore job of searching the truth about schemes that are introduced and the mannerism in which they are practiced. 

Janavani, a newspaper, was initiated in 2004, to highlight the issues of the rural poor in Orissa and had addressed varied issues of corruption, primary school education, sanitation, status of women, child rights, rights of the indigenous and the Dalits, etc. This was another initiative to highlight the problems in the rural areas which did not find coverage in main stream media.

Social Media and Rural Journalism

Certain Social Media forums are now taking the trouble of atleast contributing a few articles on Rural journalism. Social media news forums like 'The Quint' have journalists who travel to different corners of India. There are other Social media outlets that help circulate the demands of those suffering in the rural areas. However, these are very few and their intentions not very clear.


Rural Journalism in today's context


However, Rural journalism seems to be receding in India. While local newspapers do provide local news. Rural areas are often not covered  by mainstream media, be it the English newspapers or the numerous news channels broadcasted as main stream media. 

One reason for Rural areas not being covered is that they are hard to reach and cost the media houses a good deal of money to pay the journalist and his travels. Rural areas are often deprived of resources like electricity, health, sanitation, education and even their basic rights of housing and food. Malnutrition is high in many rural pockets. Medication is a luxury in these pockets as people have to travel kilometers to access a hospital. 

Even in today's arena, where mobile technology has developed, many interior places do not have towers and one has to walk a distance to get some network to be able to communicate. Some remote villages in places like Uttarakhand are being abandoned as development has barely trickled in those areas. Travelling to such places hold a lot of challenge and many media houses with their corporatised scenario that focuses on increasing profits, do not aim to provide news such as these.

Journalism today, is mostly done in the precincts of city offices and are often fed news by news agencies. A few local newspapers do carry local stories. Certain channels find extremely silly stories to garner TRP ratings, which by itself is a gimmickry to gain advertisement revenue and is itself faulty.

Journalism in India which was meant to be watchdog, has turned into a ‘Couch’ Dog journalism, where journalists barely travel out of their office, and those who do are very few. Most are involved in lapdog journalism appeasing the politicians and Corporate firms who have invested in their channels. For the rest, they debate vociferously with various politicians, and civil society members to reach the ultimate aim of a debate very often pre-decided as to in whose favour the questions should be raised. The worst scenario that has started as a trend is the aspect of Pretentious photo and video shoot of Politicians, who to garner votes travel by rich cars and helicopters to rural areas, click themselves feeding the poor or working in the fields with them as part of their publicity stunt and return back to their rich domains after getting media coverage. There are very few channels, especially the English channels that actually cater to rural news. And if they do, it is very rare.

Most leading National news channels have very few on-foot journalists who go to interior pockets to cover issues. In most cases, these rural beats are not covered at all as rural journalists barely exist. 

However, there are international channels that do cover certain Rural news from across the world, These news stories are not just about rural areas, they also relate to human interest stories. Channels like Al Jazeera have highlighted these stories from around the globe.

P Sainath and Rural Journalism


In India, Journalist P Sainath is considered to be the Father of Rural journalism. 

He has these words to say, “You see it in the simplest and most direct way: the organisation of beats. Many beats have become extinct. Take the labour correspondent: when labour issues are covered at all, they come under the header of Industrial Relations, and they’re covered by business correspondents. That means they’re covered by the guy whose job is to walk in the tracks of corporate leaders, and who, when he deigns to look at labour, does it through the eyes of corporate leaders. Now find me the agriculture columnist – in most newspapers, the idea doesn’t exist anymore. If you lack correspondents on those two beats, you’re saying 70 per cent of the people in this country don’t matter, I don’t want to talk to them.”[3] In other words, P Sainath has pointed out how rural journalism on broadcast media and traditional media has drastically diminished.

Santosh Kumar Biswal says, “It is quite apparent that rural journalism remains a grey area in Indian journalism. Journalists working in urban areas are not nuanced enough to understand and report rural problems. The paucity of reporters at grassroots level, less space or time allocation, and shoddy newsroom management have further damaged rural journalism.”[4]

It was a relentless effort by Sainath some years back to cover thousands of kilometres by various means of transport including walking for long distances, to cover stories from, five extremely backward rural pockets of India. This was precisely at a time, when the economic reforms led by Manmohan Singh, an economist of very high calibre brought about a dynamic change in India’s economic history leading to a growth in urbanisation. Which further meant that Journalism, especially News Journalism began covering urban issues. Economic prosperity and added challenges due to the growth in magazines and their writings further challenged the Newspapers to revamp themselves to add customers which mean to newspapers resorting to cover elite lifestyles.

It was at this point of time, that journalists like P Sainath contributed massively to bring news reports of the real India in the rural pockets which most papers did not wish to cover due to expenses involved. He worked for the ‘Times group’ for a brief period while doing those articles.  He set an example with his stories which are evident in his popular book, ‘Everybody loves a good drought.’ His writings pose a challenge to the current journalists and media houses of today, who fail to cover most of the news in Rural pockets.

Santosh Kumar Biswal in his article ‘Rural journalism in a shambles’ in ‘The Statesman’, writes that “The reportage that romanticises farmers’ suicides has now become passé in India. The role of media as the harbinger of new ideas for rural development is yet to be pragmatically explored and sensed. Unfortunately, the empowering role of journalism has been weakened as priority is being given to making profits. Often news is commoditized and manufactured. Bad practices of journalism are driving away the good. Growing skewed proportion in terms of production, distribution and consumption of news between rural news consumers and urban consumers is widening. Who is to be blamed for the precarious condition of rural journalism in India? ”[5]

Conclusion 


It is a known fact that a majority of our people are from the rural areas. While there are local newspapers that cover news. The mainstream channels have failed to cater to rural news and address the problems of the rural population. Rural journalism does get a boost through Social media when a particular news goes viral. However, alt media needs to be boosted. Rural journalism that can question the inadequacy of schemes and highlight the plight of rural citizens needs to find space on mainstream media. This should be made mandatory as part of development journalism by the Government. 

Media can become watchdogs and help the government to reach out and transform our villages for the better through the noble service they can render through Rural journalism. The Government should also permit genuine Social media websites catering to Rural news to work as NGOs providing them help to uplift the society around them by showcasing their issues and also providing the news of what benefits were provided. This will prove as a boon both for the rural areas and the Country.



[1] Usha Rai, The power of rural reporting, December 05, 2014, https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/variety/the-power-of-rural-reporting/article23031352.ece, downloaded on April 9, 2019.
[2] Usha Rai, The power of rural reporting, December 05, 2014, https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/variety/the-power-of-rural-reporting/article23031352.ece, downloaded on April 9, 2019.
[3] "Interview with Raghu Karnad in Outlook Magazine". Outlookindia.com. Retrieved 29 November 2011.
[4] Santosh Kumar Biswal, Rural journalism in a shambles, Pune, December 2, 2018 11:47 am, https://www.thestatesman.com/opinion/rural-journalism-shambles-1502712969.html
[5] Santosh Kumar Biswal, Rural journalism in a shambles, Pune, December 2, 2018 11:47 am, https://www.thestatesman.com/opinion/rural-journalism-shambles-1502712969.html

Tuesday, 9 April 2019

JOURNALISM AND GLOBALISATION IN THE INDIAN CONTEXT


JOURNALISM AND GLOBALISATION

Technological advancement has led to massive changes in the way journalism occurs today. Mass Communication propelled by the arrival of Digital technology, instant data transfer due to the Internet, the new media and the Social networking forums have brought in massive changes in the arena of journalism. News travels fast. News has become globalised, especially due to the internet. Given the fact that most media houses are today run by Corporates, International and Transnational Institutions, Individuals with high share of investments, one cannot deny the complexity in the web of transactions that is occurring on a day to day basis at both national and international levels.

Globalisation has contributed to massive changes in the flow of information. Journalism cannot be explained today without linking it to the influence of Globalisation. The new interconnectivity due to the digital revolution and the speed at which information is passed has massively transformed the way journalism occurs. As rightly put by Stephen Reese, “The globalization of journalism occurs through a multitude of levels, relationships, social actors, and places, as they combine to create new public spaces.”[1] (Reese, 2010)


  1. Globalisation, writes Splichal, denotes the formation of a global system composed of a variety of combinations among national, international and transnational institutions, corporations, associations, individuals and other groupings, and refers broadly to the increased complexity and interdependency of societies due to all kinds of transactions across national borders, enabled by information, communication and transportation technologies “but not simply triggered by them”.[2] (Igor Vobic)
  2. Global connections support new forms of journalism, which create politically significant new spaces within social systems, lead to social change, and privilege certain forms of power. [3] (Reese, 2010)
  3. In simple words, the Globalisation phenomena in relation to Journalism indicates the formation of a complex communication system at the world level due to the interaction between national, international, transnational, institutions, news agencies, corporations and Individuals. The use of Global media basically means media employed by multinational corporations that cater to reach out to audiences globally. Herman and McChesney say that ‘Global media’ have been variously defined as those having a global reach or in being owned by global transnational corporations (Herman and McChesney, 1997).[4]

It is a known factor in India that owning a media channel in India is no more a one individual entity, it is a complex business transaction of various stakeholders whose needs are catered to simultaneously in the current scenario. Traditional media can no more remain with the one-way perspective and has to make itself and has made itself relevant by becoming digital. This has been largely witnessed with newspaper turning to web, digital and social media platforms to run the race, stay relevant and garner audiences who will read content. Media houses have turned into multi-dimensional, cross media conglomerates who cater to varied audiences through Traditional, Broadcast and New media across the world due to accessibility. A news that is aired in India via different channels can get picked up by countries abroad, due to the permeating digital technology and new media forums that have made them accessible. It is easier today for channels to have transactions with other channels to borrow news footage or news snippets due to transaction possibilities midst business corporations.

However, the one popular statement by Marshal Mcluhan that the world there is becoming ‘a global village’ by might not be a complete fact. There is indeed a plethora of information that is transmitted due to technological advancement, however the concept of Global village, speaks of a unison in the consumption of data that is provided and a similarity in the style in which the data is made for consumption for the world at large. This seems to be a far-fetched idea. Despite the varied amount of information transaction, journalism which has developed in a technological approach by leaps and bounds is very much a product of local culture, in the Indian context. In India, the local languages still continue to hold popularity whether it be print, broadcast or Social networking forums. The situation replicates in different countries while catering to their own masses.

While, there is a massive flow of information that occurs due to satellite television, Internet and Digital technology, the information before reaching masses goes through the process of massive gatekeeping, coloured and presented in a style and format that appeals to the audience or the recipient of this information especially in the case of traditional and Broadcast media. Thus, there are varied perspectives of Globalisation effects on journalism which need to be studied while discussing this topic.

 MEDIA GLOBALISATION:  Historical perspectives

CONTEXTUALIZING THE FOUR THEORIES OF THE PRESS 

Historically, there have been various theories that have contributed to the study of Journalism and Globalisation. These include the Four theories of the press and the Modernisation Theory that has been a part of Journalism and Mass Communication studies for ages. The Four theories of the Press popularised four dimensions of Journalistic practices that were being followed in various parts of the World. In the aftermath of various changes that have occurred in different parts of the world including wars, political skirmishes, Divisions and turmoil, the theories have to re-interpreted and re-drafted for today’s world.

While, The Authoritarian theory, The Libertarian theory, The Soviet Communist theory and The Social Responsibility theory provided an explanation of media functioning at a given point of time, but have today turned out to be merely a part of historical Data with barely little relevance in today’s technological scenario according to many scholars. Igor Vobic says that the “Four Theories of the Press, which became a landmark study of journalism through broader societal prisms for the next forty years, but, over the last decade or so, has been widely accused of theoretical shallowness and unsubstantial conceptual uniformity in its generalisations on media, society and cross-national dynamics.”[5]  This holds true to many parts of the world including India. Media in India initially was an embodiment of Self Responsibility and a Democratic tool working as a fourth pillar that kept the other three pillars of the judiciary, the executive and the legislature in check. However, the Broadcast media was always  a tool of the government as it was considered a public broadcasting service in India in its initial stages. Its privatisation of media that led to commercialisation and globalisation of Indian media. So, the model of the Four theories needs to be re- read in the light of the Indian Context. While Social Responsibility with Self Regulation has always been the underlying factor for Print media, Broadcast was initially a puppet of the Government, and continues to be so in the case of National Broadcast media like Doordarshan, LokSabha TV, Rajya Sabha TV, and the All India Radio (Aakashvani) na dthe FM channels run by Prasar Bharti. With the dawn of Privatisation and commercialisation, Slef Regulation and Ethics, Accountability and Objectivity of News has become questionable over a period of years. Thus, in the Indian context, one needs to re-define a new theory that suits the situation.

MODERNISATION PERSPECTIVES

The Four theories of the Press Model was followed by the modernisation perspective which expected a westernised style of development model and the use of Mass media to perpetrate such a model which did not take into consideration the existing wisdom of the land. It was considered to be a kind of Americanisation of media and media content that was unidirectional. However, As Igor Vobic rightly puts it, “Since the 1980s and 1990s, the centralised dynamics of change across local boundaries, facilitated by fuzzy concepts of Americanisation or Westernisation, have been criticised by the counter argument that global flows are “multidirectional” and that the simple image of Western political, economic and cultural domination obscures the complexity, reciprocity and unevenness of its interaction between local and global . [6]

The same can be spoken about the Indian continent. In India, although the initial experiment of Television was initiated with a high amount of scepticism and a strict control on the airing of programmes which were mostly educational and gradually transformed into a means to educate, reform and transform due to projects like the Kheda project which were initiated by Vikram Sarabhai (a scientist) and his vision. The concept of Journalism was viewed as a respected profession, especially due to the role of traditional media in the freedom struggle. This was followed by a period of proliferation of the Press and media as it turned profitable due to Advertisement revenue and an increase in readers. Despite the curbs that were initiated during Emergency and war, Journalists proved it time and again, that media was the fourth pillar in Democracy. It was only in the late 80’s and early 90’s that commercialisation stepped in and television was transformed.

The arrival of the cable TV did temporarily lead to a lot of western content gaining popularity which acknowledged the modernisation theory. However, this was not for long as India found its own local cable and satellite content through the commercial channel Zee which transformed the scenario. This commercialisation of not just tele programmes and entertainment reached the limits when Private News channels with large local and international investments were permitted to air news. This was the step by step beginning of a globalised approach. The entire process which initially saw Globalisation as an influence of content that is westernised gradually got transformed into glocalised content. Content was made palatable to the Indian audiences. That brings us to a sub topic in the phenomenon of globalisation and that is Glocalisation.

GLOCALISATION


Global village leads to an idea of Homogenised content. However, this not the fact. Most content is not homogenised, rather it is domesticated, which has led to the rise of the term Glocalisation. There are many globally popular channels that run their local versions in India. For instance BBC Hindi, CNN IBN, etc.

‘Glocalization,’ a popular concept in this literature, can be seen not as the inevitable interplay between local and cultural forces from a distance, but as the uniform imposition of a global (village) standard across a range of local circumstances. These interpretations, however, obscure the real complexity of globalization.[7]

While Stephen Reese says that “The impact of globalization on news in India, when understood as glocalization, can be interpreted as a set of practices in which the local media have absorbed the global, rejuvenated the local, and given audiences possibilities of strengthening democratic discourses.”[8] However, true this might be in case of Print Media and certain Social Media platforms like Blogs, It may not be a fact with regard to Broadcast Media. Indeed, India is a democratic country and much of Print Media still holds up the values, but Broadcast Media in most cases has succumbed to the pressures of Capitalism.

India has a hub of channels where content is glocalised in multiple languages and packaged aptly catering to what the audience wants (not what the audience needs) based on the socio-cultural practices of the place or state in which it is being aired.

Glocalisation and the Indian Scenario

Media in most places follows the same perspective. It is often designed to cater to the people of the place. News picked up from any corner of the World when reported in Indian media is often given the Indian twist. Often in today’s arena, news journalism caters to the advertisers, Politicians and the corporates. News Journalists have become a prey to subjective Journalism choosing the voice of their sponsors and their own personal biases over factual and accountable information. The interference of Politicians in India has turned many media channels into news promoters of particular parties who sponsor them. Information flow of Global news is very poor in national news channels. Global news has been reduced to a very brief mention of particular issues of chosen countries after gate keeping. In most cases, Journalists in India have been accused of cantankerous debates, dramatization of issues, especially those involving neighbouring countries like Pakistan, and bowing down to political pressures. The term ‘Godi’ media a term to indicate lapdog journalism has been framed in Hindi for many national news channels.

Satellite television however, is a boon for Globalisation with a multiple number of channels that can be accessed makes available counter-flow news information with the availability of channels like Al Jazeera and BBC. Many Indian National TV news journalists and news channels have been accused of reducing News journalism to debates based on twitter statements or statements made by politicians against each other. In a few cases of National catastrophes like floods or other major issues are journalists sent to cover up stories. On foot journalists have been reduced to a bare minimum to reduce expenses of many news Channels. It is has become a child’s game to identify which political party a particular journalist supports in the manner in which news stories get covered and narrated.

Global news is mostly available on Digitised and Internet platforms. And those with easy access to the internet can read the same. But this doesn’t apply to a major portion of the country who are from rural pockets.  Furthermore, those accessing news, access local channels and local languages. Thus Global news is a very rare occurrence on Indian news channels, which barely cover the news from India itself. Albeit the fact that International news that could affect international policies relating to India, the Trips by the Prime Minister to varied countries, etc does find space on our channels and so does News that includes gross murders, blasts and threats. But these are usually time framed into small snippets.

Sting operations by Social Media journalists who have a social media platform called Cobrapost have also revealed how major cross media conglomerates were willing to compromise their news content for a huge sum of cash. Instances such as these have wrecked the standards of journalism, the content generation and the authentic flow of intelligent news.

News channels have also brought various infotainment means including debates mingled with Quawwalis ( an Indian art form of music) where along with the politicians, two teams of Quawwali musicians debate in song supporting each party.  Cartoons that highlight political situation are also popular. News journalists in some local channels have gone to varied heights to dramatize news. This was seen in the latest Pulwama incident. Where news rooms on certain channels were made to look like war rooms and journalists dressed in soldier uniforms presented news. A gross mockery of the incident which received a huge amount of flak from the citizens of the country.

CONCLUSION


Domestication and Glocalisation is today an accepted phenomenon. And, the same applies for other countries as Stephen Reese says, “Certainly, the foreign news most people receive, even about big international events, is domesticated through the national journalistic lens. Indeed, international reporting, as a key component of the would-be global public sphere, flunks Hafez’s ‘global test,’ incurring the same criticisms others have levelled for years at national journalism: elite-focused, conflictual, and sensational, with a narrow, parochial emphasis. If ‘global’ means giving ‘dialogic’ voices a chance to speak to each other without reproducing national ethnocentrism, then the world’s media still fail to measure up.” (Reese, 2010)[9]

Globalisation and journalism are thus interconnected but with various dimensions that make it a complex phenomenon to explain in a consistent limited vocabulary. Globalisation is easier defined within the precincts of Information and Communication Technology wherein, news journalism is easily accesible on the Internet. And countries can access news channels and news from varied corners of the earth due to the internet. However, this information doesn't guarantee a complete understanding of news as the interpretations differ depending the politico- socio -cultural understanding of people. However, in the content of Broadcast media, one has to note that most national and local news channels, domesticate the news. Those international channels which can be accessed due to the cable and dish antenna are the alt source of news that permeate a global reach and a globalised information process.



[1] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[2] Igor Vobic, Editorial Open Access Journalism and Globalisation: Paradigms, Problems, Prospects,
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/journalism-and-globalisation-paradigms-problems-prospects-2165-7912.1000e123.php?aid=6472, Downloaded on 15-03-2019
[3] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[4] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[5] Igor Vobic, Editorial Open Access Journalism and Globalisation: Paradigms, Problems, Prospects,
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/journalism-and-globalisation-paradigms-problems-prospects-2165-7912.1000e123.php?aid=6472, Downloaded on 15-03-2019
[6] Igor Vobic, Editorial Open Access Journalism and Globalisation: Paradigms, Problems, Prospects,
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/journalism-and-globalisation-paradigms-problems-prospects-2165-7912.1000e123.php?aid=6472, Downloaded on 15-03-2019
[7] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[8] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[9] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x

Friday, 22 February 2019

Journalism in Post-Independence India


Journalism in Post-Independence India

                  

Era of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru


It is said that in the post-independence era, under the Prime minister-ship of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, the freedom of the press was respected after a long hiatus of toil and turmoil under the British clamps. As the first Prime minister of this country, Jawaharlal Nehru never shied away from criticism. He strongly believed in the freedom of the press. 

M. Chalapathy Rau writes in his article, “The press after Nehru”, in the Economic Weekly, “It was a part of his liberal outlook and a part of his upbringing in Liberal England…To Jawaharlal Nehru, who was accustomed to self-inquisition and self-criticism, criticism was the breath of life and had to be tolerated. No other public man of his standing tolerated criticism as much as he did. It was the democratic way of life, and life itself. To him, journalism was neither history nor literature in a hurry; it was a part of action, political action, social action.” (Rau, 1964)

Nehru once said: “To my mind the freedom of the press is not just a slogan from the larger point of view, but it is an essential attribute of the democratic process. I have no doubt that even if the Government dislikes the liberties taken by the press and considers them dangerous, it is wrong to interfere with the freedom of the press. I would rather have a completely free press with all the dangers involved in the wrong use of that freedom than a suppressed or a regulated press” (Padhy and Sahu, 2005:110).

However, there was one occasion that Nehru did have to take a stand on Press freedom as it was fanning communal riots within the country and dividing India. In the year 1951, On October 23rd, he passed the new Act called “The Press Objectionable Matters Act”. The only reason was to prevent papers that indulged in propagating communal division through pictures and words. The act was similar to the legislation passed by the Britishers in the early 20th century. 

Objectionable matters included any words, signs, or visible representations which were likely to incite or encourage any person to resort to violence or sabotage for the purpose of overthrowing or undermine the Government, or to interfere with supply and distribution of food or other essential commodities or services (Ravindran, 1997:25, Shodhganga). However, the fact that Nehru was a liberal man couldn’t be contested.


Era of Indira Gandhi


It is said that during the Chinese Aggression, when an Emergency was declared in 1961, Nehru’s stance on curbing the press was minimal as compared to the clamp placed during the tenure of the prime ministership of his daughter, Indira Gandhi.

The First Press Commission estimated that the total circulation of the 300 or so daily newspapers being published in India in 1953 was 2.53 million. This worked out to 5.40 copies per 1000 in the population against the backdrop of an all India literacy level of 16.40 per cent. From such a low base, India’s daily newspaper circulation climbed slowly to 3.15 million in 1957 and 5.11 million in 1962. It would take the press three decades after the attainment of Independence to cross the 10 million mark and, in a manner of speaking, join the ranks of the ‘Mass media’. It would take thirty-two years of Independence for the total circulation of Hindi daily newspapers finally to overtake the total circulation of English language newspapers in India. (Ray)

It is to be noted here that the freedom of the press was totally subjugated under the leadership of late Indira Gandhi. The Emergency in 1971, due to the war with Pakistan was the worst ever period in the history of the Press after Freedom. Under her leadership, she sought to bring in a rule that limits publication to around 15,000 in quantity.

“On December 4th the Defence and Internal Security of India Act was signed into law. This Act prohibited the printing or publishing of any newspaper, book or other document detrimental to the defence and security of India; it provided for the demand of security from any newspaper or publisher or the forfeiture of security already given; it empowered the Government to confiscate copies of any printed matter which might be inflammatory and to close down the presses; and it empowered the state and local Governments to impose censorship” (Karkhanis, 1981:130).

Era of Morarji Desai


The press was in tatters. When Indira Gandhi lost her power and Morarji Desai was voted to power, freedom of the press was restored back again. He repealed the Prevention of Publication of the Objectionable Matter Act of 1976 with the due procedural approval of both the houses in the Parliament on the behest of his Minister for Information and Broadcasting, L.K. Advani, who was also a journalist by profession and had been imprisoned during the emergency.

However, by 1979, Morarji Desai lost power and Indira Gandhi returned. This time again, the press faced hostility but not as severe as it was during the emergency. However, many State governments too ignored the Press. After Indira Gandhi was killed in 1984, Rajiv Gandhi rose to power on a wave of sympathy by the people. Freedom of Press was restored again. 

Era of Rajiv Gandhi


But Rajiv Gandhi too became wary of the press towards 1988 and the negativity garnered about his government due to press reportage. So, just like his mother, he too brought in a ‘Defamation bill’ that intended to curb the freedom of the Press but was not able to do so as the bill was not approved at its initial stage. Rajiv Gandhi who was liberal could not handle the negativity from the press after a few years. 

Later years...


However, the press was seemingly free albeit the influence and the economical pressures that came in the long run. Development Journalism and Journalists of repertoire were popular.

Newspapers continue to provide information, entertainment, edutainment and a good dose of Yellow journalism too. Unlike the yester years, newspapers today include news with a lot of features for students for fashion, for style, for environment, etc. The papers run into pages catering to varied topics of news of the state, of the country, world news, business and sports. Today most of these are also available in their Online formats. 

The 21st century however has seen to extreme monetisation and corporatisation of the Press at large, News is compromised at the alter of Advertisement to garner the much- needed revenue to run a newspaper. Most corporates run a newspaper and a news channel along with a website. Technology has jumped leaps and bounds.

While newspapers, still continue to provide information and there are many that continue to remain true to the roots of journalism, there are others who do not mind putting a spin on the news to suit their corporate owners and the political parties that fund them. Many deserving plights of the people are not brought to the forum due to fear of a backlash from particular political parties. 

Although newspapers do provide news, it is mostly news that has been retrieved from News sources and news service portals or news agencies. There are very few journalists on their foot. The news room in many television channels has become a war zone, often on the basis of who said what to whom and why, rather than raising issues. A few issues do get raised but these are overridden with other debates. Many newspapers and news channels toe-the-line of the Government and the Corporate businesses who have major shares in their firm.  However, in return many journalists have turned to Social networking forums to provide news snippets that are not doctored or at the mercy of the State and other Corporates.

Journalism is the fourth pillar of Democracy and has contributed massively to the development of the country. It continues to do so due to the many untarnished journalists available in the country at large. However, there is a need to protect the integrity of the journalists. 

On its part, the Press should be encouraged to play a restraint on sensitive topics that divide the country or issues of security. But should be asked to focus on journalism the leads to development of all its citizens rather than the table top journalism and the page three stuff (focus on Parties and dressing) that most news forums are catering too.



Tuesday, 19 February 2019

ROLE OF PRESS IN INDIA’S FREEDOM STRUGGLE




ROLE OF PRESS IN INDIA’S FREEDOM STRUGGLE

Sis Michelle Notes, Unit 2, 2.4

Literature has always been a part of Indian History from ancient times. However, the very concept of newspapers was a western concept that was promulgated in India by the Britishers. While, most of the Britishers initially started the newspapers, the people of the Country, gradually took over with great gusto the pen- a tool mightier than the sword in the world of newspaper publishing. 

The newspapers indeed became a channel of information, education and awareness. They were the major contributors in the freedom struggle under the patronage of Stalwart leaders and Social reformists who were bold and courageous and took to the pen in various corners of India to garner people’s attention to their plight and to unite them to fight against tyranny, domination and atrocities. Some of these papers who stood apart and contributed to the freedom struggle are mentioned in this article.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy, popular social reformist who was known for his intellectual skills and his strong opinion against social evils like Sati, brought out a newspaper himself. Roy wrote many articles opposing Sati and other social evils that had ingrained themselves in Hindu culture. He wrote against the orthodox ideas that perpetrated these social evils in religion. He was not in favour of the Serampore missionaries who were promoting Christianity either. His paper ‘Bangadoot’ which was published in 1829 was actually printed in four languages. Namely English, Bangla, French, and Nagree (Hindi dialect) which highlighted all the above issues.

A Marathi weekly, 'Prabhakar’ which was edited by Govind Vitthal Kunte, who was popularly known as ‘Bhau Mahajan’ was published in the year 1841.  Prabhakar was popular for its stance on Swabhasha, Swadeshi and Swa-sanskruti,  which basically meant, ‘our language, our country and our culture’ and had its run for almost 25 years.  He is considered as the first professional Marathi Journalist and his paper catered to social reform.

Bringing in reform came another paper in 1851 called the Rast Goftar published by the popular freedom fighter and social reformer Dadabhai Nowroji in Anglo-Gujarati, who gradually reached out to all Indians through his publishing. 

The Hindu Patriot was an English newspaper which also played a very important role in conscientising people about the Indigo planters who oppressed the peasants and the imperial laws like the immigration bill, etc,. The paper was initially published on January 6, 1853 by Madhusudan Roy under the editorship of Girish Chandra Ghosh. But, it was later purchased by Harish Chandra Mukherjee. However, Harish Chandra named his Brother Haran Chandra as the Proprietor to shield himself from the Military Audit General under whom he officiated.

In 1857, a paper with strong Political views with a view of Hindu-Muslim unity for the freedom of India was ‘Payam-e-Azadi’ which was the brainchild of Azimullah Khan and edited by Mirza Bedar Bhakt. Azimullah Khan was well aware of the divide and rule policy and he tried his best to conscientize the people about the same through his paper. Gautam Chattopadhyay in his article ‘Petition, Protest and Revolt- The changing face of the Anti-Imperialist Press in India 1857- 1947’ writes that “The paper started publication from Delhi in February 1857 in Hindi-Urdu and right from May 1857 it openly supported the rebels. In September 1857, its Marathi edition was published from Jhansi and it became truly the central organ of the revolt. Copies of this journal are now available only in the British Library.” (Johansson, 1989)

In the year 1862, another Hindi paper that was started in Bombay was called the Induprakash by Vishnu Parshuram Pandit which rallied itself for the Indian freedom Movement by publishing political articles.

Girish Chandra Ghosh started an English newspaper in 1862 called The Bengalee. This paper too supported the freedom struggle and did have a good circulation. However, it is said that when it took a moderate stand on Swadeshi, the circulation was hit. This newspaper saw various phases as it was made into a morning and evening edition for urban and rural areas with the names The Bengalee for the morning and The Calcutta Evening News for the evening paper. However, the paper The Bengalee could not survive and was finally again made into one newspaper and renamed as The Star of India.

Amrita Bazaar Patrika was another English newspaper that contributed greatly to journalism and especially to the freedom struggle in India. The paper was initially in Bengali language but gradually became a bilingual and began its print in English. Today the place where this paper was initially printed exists in Dhaka, Bangladesh. It was a weekly printed by Moti Lal and Sisir Ghosh in Bengali and launched on  February 20, 1868.  It is said that both Sisir and Moti Lal vehemently opposed the economic exploitation of India and the restriction on an individual’s civil liberties. They were close friends of Bal Gangadhar Tilak and went into great depths at exposing the atrocities and loop holes of the British Administration in India. It was a weekly that became a daily in 1891 and was one among the first one’s in India to enter into the genre of Investigative journalism. Despite many attempts at trying to dissuade the nationalistic activities, including cases of sedition and imprisonment on its editors at various times, this paper stood the test and kept on promulgating the cause of India’s freedom.

The Statesman too was an English newspaper that emerged from the merging of two newspapers called The Englishman and Friend of India. It was started in 1875. The Statesman was a paper worth acknowledgement. It opposed the decision of making Delhi the capital of India instead of Calcutta (now Kolkata). Ian M Stephens, the editor of the newspaper, who was disappointed that the world was not taking note of the drastic conditions of the Bengal famine (1943- 1944) due to the deliberate clamp on the freedom of the Press, printed a group of pictures which actually put Bengal famine in the limelight much to the dismay of the Administration. It is said The Statesman stood its ground in also opposing Indira Gandhi during the Emergency.

Vishnushastri Krushnashastri Chiplunkar was another prolific writer who wrote political articles that criticised the British Colonial rule and the Christian Missionaries in a Marathi paper called ‘Shalapatrak’ started by his father, Krushnashastri Chiplunkar, but had to be shut down in 1875 due to the controversies it got embroiled into for its stance. He then started another monthly called the ‘Nibhandmala’ a Marathi language Magazine which meant ‘a garland of essays’. The magazine had revolutionary ideas and which had a run for almost 12 years with almost all the essays contributed by him. He also teamed up with Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Gopal Ganesh Agarkar in 1880 for Kesari in Marathi and Mahratta in English. To familiarise people with Marathi History and poetry, he started another monthly in 1878 called Kavyetihas Sangraha and went on to establish two presses and a bookshop.

Bal Gangadhar Lokmanya Tilak, the popular freedom fighter himself started Kesari in 1881, a paper whose writings were aglow with the fire of freedom, swadeshi and social- reforming ideas. He sparked political and social upheavals with his bold and impressive writings. The Kesari was a huge success. He also started the Mahratta in English. Kesari stoked the fire of freedom and had a very huge number of subscriptions. Tilak with his zeal and passion for Swaraj (freedom) had the knack of touching people’s hearts and winning them over  through various initiatives like the Ganesh Mandali’s and his love and defence of Shivaji. Kesari became a powerful weapon in the fight against British rule in India.




In 1883, a bi-lingual journal in Hindi -English called 'Hindusthan' was begun by Raja Rampal Singh which was printed in London and had a subscription of Rs 10. He was the Talukdar of Kalakankar. On his return to India, he purchased a press and began publishing the same in three languages, namely, English, Hindi and Urdu. But by 1885, it had become nationalist in its views, was pro-Hindi and published as a Hindi daily.  This daily stopped its publication by the year 1912.

SaraswatiAbhyudaya (1900), and many other papers revolutionised the era in their times. Acharya Mahavir Prasad Dwivedi, was a man known for his expertise in literature, history. It was under his editorship that ‘Saraswati’, a newspaper in Khadi Hindi, gained huge prominence.

A sub-editor named Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi contributed his mite to ‘Saraswati’ too. At a later stage, in 1913, Vidyarthi started his own newspaper called ‘Pratap’ which gained huge popularity. He was a social reformist and often highlighted in his paper the plight of the suffering farmers of Rae Bareilly and other suffering people in the Indian states.


Jugantar Patrika (1906) was another Bengali revolutionary newspaper founded in Calcutta by Barindra Kumar Ghosh, Abhinash Bhattacharya and Bhupendranath Dutt. The journal led to the formation of the Jugantar group who were heavily punished and even deported for their ideas, works and views which also included use of violence against Britishers. It was also critical of the ideology of the Indian National Congress. It carried numerous articles of Barindra Kumar Ghosh and Aurobindo Ghosh who were revolutionaries. 

The paper had a good readership of almost 20,000 copies and was primarily targeted towards the youth with the desire to politically motivate them and was priced those days at one paisa. 
Bhupendranath Dutt who was the editor till 1907, was punished for writing articles that the British claimed were inciting violence against them. It had to shut down its operations by 1908.

Although initially, most Tamil newspapers did not have problem with the government as there were no objectionable views. But towards the twentieth century there was a turn around. Papers like the Swadesmitran, the Hindu and the Swaraj were all printed from Tamil Nadu. At this point a Tamil periodical that created waves of patriotic fervour was S. N. Thirumalachari’s, ‘India’ which was published on May 6, 1906. The periodical is said to be one of the first one’s to publish cartoons that had political messages in the history of Indian journalism. The paper boldly carried articles and songs that were nationalistic in nature. Thus, was laid a foundation of a bold Press that supported the Indian Freedom movement in Tamil Nadu. “From the India office, many pamphlets and booklets were published about the Swadeshi propaganda and speeches of the extremists. The famous speech of Tilak on the ‘Tenets of the New party’ at the College Square in Calcutta was translated into Tamil by Subramania Bharati and published in February 1907. It was printed at the India Printing Works, Broadway, and the same place where India periodical was printed. The Speeches of B.C. Pal (in Madras), Life of Aurobindo Ghosh and Congress Yatra were printed and distributed from India newspaper office press. [6] (Sakthivel R., 2015)

When ‘India's’ printing had to be stalled dues to problems with the British Government, the printing was continued from Pondicherry which at that point of time was not under British rule. Thus, Tamil Nadu contributed massively to the growth of the Vernacular journalism.

Another newspaper which albeit had a short run was strongly patriotical and published in Urdu was ‘Swarajya’ which was published from 1907 to 1910 .Gautam Chattopadhyay in his article ‘Petition, Protest and Revolt- The changing face of the Anti-Imperialist Press In India 1857- 1947 writes that Swarajya a weekly, “denounced Bristish Rule in India week after week in scathing terms and called for the overthrow of British Rule in India. During four years of its existence, it suffered an ordeal unique in the annals of Indian journalism. Its successive editors were Shanti Narayan, Ram Das Suralia, Motilal Verma, Babu Ram Hari, Munshi Ram Sewak, Nanda Gopal Chopra, Sham Das Verma, ‘Field Marshal’ Ladha Ram Kapur and finally Amir Chand Bombwal. All the editors, except the last one, were tried and convicted by the British in a barbarous manner. They suffered long terms of rigorous imprisonment and deportation to the Andamans. (Johansson, 1989)

Among the most prominent names, we also have papers like ‘The Leader’ from Allahabad, ‘The Bombay Chronicle’, ‘The Hindustan times’, etc. Founded by Madan Mohan Malviya on October 24, 1909 in Allahabad, ‘The Leader’ had a long run till Sept. 6, 1967 and was considered to be an influential newspaper in English run by Indians due to its politically charged stance. The Paper also carried numerous writings by Mahatma Gandhi. The chief-editor was C. Y. Chintamani. It is said that Motilal Nehru was also partly associated with this newspaper. However, he and C. Y. Chintamani had a clash which gradually led to Motilal Nehru quitting the Paper.


                                                           THE BOMBAY CHRONICLE

Another English Paper which was known for its raconteur and its political content especially during the upheavals and the freedom struggles was The Bombay Chronicle started by a lawyer, Sir Pherozeshah Mehta. This paper had a run from 1910 to 1959.

'Vijay' another Hindi newspaper that worked immensely for the Freedom struggle was launched in the year 1918 in Delhi by Pt. Indra Vidya Vachaspati. This paper was inspired by Swami Sraddhanand who contributed many Nationalist articles. It strongly opposed the Rowlatt Act with  a series of articles well scripted by Swami Sraddhanand a lawyer by profession who was very meticulate in his opinion so that it could not be retaliated to or pulled down by the Britishers.   But after his departure to Lahore, the paper could not survive and succumbed in 1920.

Another great journalist and intellectual who shaped Marathi Journalism and in the long run, was the primary brain-child behind the Indian Constitution was Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar. On January 31, 1920, he started his first newspaper, 'Mooknayak', which only ran for three years and focussed on Dalit issues. Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar also “found three more newspapers – 'Bahishkrut Bharat' (1927-1929), Janata (1930-56), and 'Prabuddha Bharat' (1956). He was directly involved in the editorial management of the first two newspapers, Mooknayak and Bahishkrut Bharat. From 1930 onwards, he delegated the task to his most important colleagues, such as, Devrao Naik, B.R. Kadrekar, G.N. Sahastrabuddhe, R.D. Bhandare, and B.C. Kamble. Interestingly, Naik, Kadrekar and Sahastrabuddhe were not Dalits”. (Prabodhan Pol, thewire)


The Hindustan Times  was involved equally in the contribution towards the cause of Freedom. It was founded by Sunder Singh of the Akali Movement in 1924 and had for in its managing committee the dynamic freedom fighter, Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya and Master Tara Singh. It is said that Mahatma Gandhi was himself present at the launch of this Paper. This paper survived the Test of time and exists even today. It is said that due to Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya’s dynamism, that The Hindustan Times was able to launch its Hindi version called the Hindustan Dainik in 1936. It contributed a great deal to the Indian freedom struggle with its journalism.

There were other papers that contributed to nationalism, freedom from the tyranny of Britishers and Hindu -Muslim unity. These include popular newspapers like ‘Biswamitra’ or ‘Viswamitra’ in 1916 started by Mahendra Chandra Aggarwal. 

Swarajya’ started in 1920 by T Prakasham, ‘Sainik’ by Krishna Dutt Paliwal in Agra, ‘Desh’ by Babu Rajendra Prasad in Patna, Swami Shradhanand’s ‘Vir Arjun’ and two other magazines, namely, ‘Nrisinha’ and ‘Devnagar’ were all popular in their era. 

Svatantra- a paper which was the mouthpiece of the Congress was begun by Ambikaprasad Bajpeyi on August 4, 1920. This paper became extremely popular as it carried the minutest details of Gandhiji's Non co-operation movement. The feature of this newspaper that stood out was the appointment of Women journalists to cover reportage of Women's meetings. It carried commercial news, had Market rates and also carried special features during the festival of Holi and Diwali. This paper however, did not have a long run as it succumbed to Press Ordinance act in 1930 where it was asked to deposit a security of Rs 5000/- .

Another paper with the same title of ‘Swatantra’ started in 1939 by Puranchand Gupta and Jagdish Chandra Kulsia. This paper was gradually launched as ‘Dainik Jagran’ which is very popular and has a huge readership today.

Another paper that brought in a revolution and popularised Hindi was ‘Aaj’ by Shiv Prasad Gupta on September 5, 1920 from Benaras with Baburao Vishnu Paradkar as its editor. The paper grew in circulation and was hailed for its stand on nationalism under the brilliant editing skills of Paradkar.




Abhyudaya by Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya was a hindi weekly, also contributed massively to the Indian freedom struggle. At a later stage he also founded the ‘Hindustan Dainik’ in Hindi in 1936 which rose to popularity.

After his return from Africa, Gandhiji revolutionised the phase in India’s struggle for freedom by steering the Satyagraha, Dandi March, Salt Satyagraha, Non-Violence Movement, promotion of Khadi and the use of the Press. His contribution to journalism was seen in all his newspapers like ‘Young India, Indian Opinion, Navajivan, Harijan in English, Harijan Bandu in Gujarati and Harijan Sevak in Hindi.

Around the year 1904, it is said that Gandhiji received a proposal in Johannesburg, to take over  a weekly. Thus, began the venture of 'Indian Opinion'  which was a multilingual weekly, largely financed by Gandhi. He initially began it with Mansukhlal Nazar as his editor, but due to a huge loss of over 200 pounds, was compelled to take up the editorship himself and transfer the printing to Phoenix where Rustomji Parsi helped with its finances.  

In India, Gandhiji also launched a Gujarati newspaper on October 7, 1919 called the Navajivan and 8 October 1919, he launched an English Daily called the 'Young India'. Navajivan- the Gujarati newspaper actually became popular and had a circulation of 12000 copies as compared to 1200 copies of Young India, which led Gandhiji to launch a Hindi version of the paper Navajivan on August 19, 1921. Although, it is said that the subscriptions of the Hindi 'Navajivan' dropped down considerably from 12000 to 1400. 



YOUNG INDIA NEWSPAPER

Indian was and continues to have an ingrained caste system. Despite the modern era, in many parts of India, this caste discrimination continues to be upheld. 'Harijan' was a word used by Gandhi to address 'the untouchables' in order to encourage people to overcome this discrimination. He gradually started a newspaper called 'Harijan' in English February 11, 1933 from the Yerwada Jail in Pune where he was imprisoned by the Britishers. He gradually launched the Hindi edition of the same paper on February 23 1933 from Delhi with Viyogi Hari as the editor and titled it as 'Harijan Sevak'. He drew the financial support for this paper from Ghansyamdas Birla. The Britishers were vary of Harijan and asked Gandhi to submit the paper for proof reading before printing. Gandhi refused the same with the demand that Freedom of the Press was his Right. The paper succumbed for this reason by its tenth issue. Gradually due to financial losses these  papers closed down too.  

The newspapers were a weapon that silently and non-violently stoked the fire of freedom all across India and the British Government grew wary of its reach and power. At the height of this movement, the British Government brought in the Press Act 1910, due to which within a few years over 350 printing presses were punished with penalisation and almost 300 newspapers were asked for security deposits. The pressurisation, penalisation and harassment led to the closure of almost 200 papers. However, this only catapulted the freedom movement as this act of penalising and trying to shut down the voices of the locals only confirmed the mismanagement in India and the cruelty shown towards Indians by the East India company and the Britishers. 

There were many pamphlets and papers printed and circulated anonymously to ignite the freedom struggle. The slogan, “the pen is mightier than the sword” proved itself true in the struggle for freedom, the demand for economic liberties and civil rights as citizens of a country and right to freedom of speech. It is the obligation of every citizen of this country to uphold these rights as these were gifted to us through the ordeal and zeal of great socially reforming journalists of great calibre.

(Pictures clicked by Sis Michelle from Indira Gandhi Museum, New Delhi)


Below are few pictures for your perusal...