Monday, 22 November 2021

Success Stories of Media and Communication usage for Development

 

 

Success stories of Development Communication in Asia

Sis Patricia Michelle Mathias fsp

 

Abstract: This paper highlights Success Stories of Media- integrated initiatives in Development Communication. In order to clearly chart through the main topic, the paper provides a summarised, historical journey of the concept of Development and the usage of media for the same followed by actual narratives from people across continents wherein Mass mediated technology was used as an important tool to empower people and contribute to Development initiatives.

 

1. Introduction

 

The word, ‘Development’ today basically highlights an empowerment of people, a community and the entire society at large to contribute to their own growth and a better living in union with nature and the cosmos at large. Development Communication is an important subject in the field of Communication that highlights the role played by Communication and Communication tools in the role of providing information and knowledge that leads to the socio-political and economic development of individuals, communities and the nation at large. A journey through the history leads us to an understanding of how Mass Media has been a constant tool in implementing the numerous initiatives despite the tumultuous terrain of learning through experiences.

 

2.  Historical Perspective of Development Communication

 

‘Development Communication’ over the years has metamorphosised from a dominating paradigm into a participatory paradigm. Historically, the initial stages of Development Communication focused on the one-way, ‘monologic’ tradition of Sender-Message-Channel-Receiver wherein, communication was seen as a persuasive stance to develop habits and practices that cater to modernization and adaptation to innovations.

Hernández-Ramos, and Wilbur Schramm (1989) state that post World War II, the U.S emerged as a massive politically and economically established power. However, the rise of the Soviet Union and the spread of Communism unnerved the U.S. In an attempt at dealing with this issue, the U.S. guided by the leadership of U S president, Harry S Truman decided on a program called the Marshall plan that provided an economical assistance to Europe. This program of aid was implemented through multilateral organisations including those like the United Nations and the International Bank for reconstruction and development. This development focussed on Industrial development brought about through economic investments, procurement of raw materials, facilitating transportation and training of personnel to cater to the Industrial needs. Aid was subsequently provided for Public Education, Health care, Population Control and Media as a ‘persuasive’ communication tool (Hernández-Ramos, and Schramm,1989).

However, scholars from the 70’s, disapproved of these development initiatives. They opined that this initial tendency wherein Development was seen as a means to overcome traditional practices and adapt to modernization, industrialization and an economic boom only led to countries with poor economies becoming poorer and depending on countries with rich economies. This awareness led to a paradigm change that included a development approach which shifted from being ‘an economically and mechanically aided development by rich donor countries to dependent countries to a development that empowered the dependent countries and its citizens to grow, transform and be empowered to participate in their own development.

This changed concept of development was spear-headed by ‘Paulo Friere’ who used adult literacy campaigns to conscientize poor farmers in the North eastern part of Brazil and empowered the landless peasants to demand for their rights for freedom from oppressive conditions and for a better living. Thus, leading to the birth of a participatory model wherein, the people of the place were conscientized and contributed equally to their own development. Communication here was used positively and the tools included both the traditional means as well the news forms of technology.

Development was thus seen as a concept not to be imposed onto people, rather, an initiative wherein people participated in the process of their empowerment and growth through education, information, awareness of their rights and provisions provided within the precincts of the country and its governance.  It was then defined in a healthier perspective that enabled the growth of human beings in their entirety, including their political, socio-economic situation and the environment.

Communication now was not just persuasive and a one way means to use media to adapt to innovations, rather communication was a means to understand the actual situation, probe the real needs, become aware of one’s rights as citizens and contribute to one’s growth hand in hand with collaboration at varied levels between authorities, experts and the recipients. Therefore, “Development communication in the words of Nora Quebral (2006) is the art and science of human communication related to a society's planned transformation from the state of poverty to a dynamic socio-economic growth that leads to a greater equality and the larger unfolding of individual potentials.

Focussing on Nedia, Royal Colle (2002) also defines Development Communication as the planned and systematic use of communication through interpersonal channels, audio-visual and mass media. Colle highlights the importance on the collects and exchanging information, mobilising people for development actions, assisting the people through the process of problem-solving during misunderstandings and the application of the Communication technology “to training and extension programs, particularly at the grassroots level, in order to improve their quality and impact” (Colle, R. 2002).  

Mass Media technology is thus one among the many tools of Communication that has been employed to reach out to the people instantaneously.

 

3.   Mass Media and Development Communication- The Success Stories

 

Mass media includes varied means of tools in Communication. These include both the Traditional forms of Media, Print Media, Electronic Media and now the ‘Digital media’. While, the yester years, saw a massive influence of traditional media such as street theatre, varied theatrical and dance forms, hoardings, booklets and posters; Community Radios, Participatory Videos and Television series; Today, New Media including Smartphone Apps, Social Media Apps, OTT apps like YouTube and likewise, have transformed the arena of Digital communication with their quick means to reach out at any given time and space.

 

3.1   Apps That Turn into A Boon for Struggling Farmers

A research Survey by Mckinsey revealed that a large number of Farmers in Brazil used digital technology for gathering information. Other studies also reveal that farmers use technologies to obtain information on the activities of the farm, farm management, purchase and sales of inputs and production, mapping land use and prediction of climatic risks (Mckinsey & Company, 2020; Colussi, 2020)

Maria Vasconcelos, the daughter of a farmer, educated in a university along with her friends Raphael and Thales, experimented with sensors that could measure rain and gradually developed a technology that can be digitally accessed on a smartphone measure soil moisture and temperature in the soil. The experiment was very successful on her own fathers’ field. Being in a village, she then contacted all her father’s friends who were farmers and those who adapted this technology benefitted so much that they further turned into role models and encouraged other to adopt this technology. The farmers benefitted, while Maria and her team turned into entrepreneurs (Be Brasil, 2021). This could be considered as an ideal development for community members.

 

3.2   A Phone Call That Turns into A Voice for The Voiceless

 

The Gondi tribe is an indigenous tribe belonging to the forests of Chhattisgarh in central India who had been ignored for long. Shubhranshu Choudhary, a journalist quit his job at the BBC world service and took help from Microsoft to build an app to highlight the news and information of the Gondi people. He thus laid the foundation of the CGnet Swara- an online voice-based portal which allows people to report a local news just by making a phone call. For this, he trained the people from the local community to deliver the audio-news reports.

Reported stories follow a process of moderation by the CGnet Swara team for authenticity purposes. For instance, when Mahesh Saket, a resident of Rewa district called to report about the only single handpump in the village that had gone dysfunctional, CGnet audience made multiple calls to the authorities, leading to the pump getting repaired in just 10 days. (Singh, 2017)

In another interesting story, a member from the tribe in the hills called the ‘Pahari Korwa’ of Raigarh district called to report about deaths of two pregnant women as they couldn’t reach the hospital on time due to lack of good roads and also mentioned the number of the collector in his message.  The collector was surprised to receive a call from New Jersey to ask what was done about the same. Today, the village has transformed and the villagers now also have a school in this area (Singh, 2017). Initiatives such as these form the crux of Development.

 

3.3   Participatory Videos (PV) for Social Change

 

The concept of the Participatory video began initially to highlight the plight of the people by making a video of theirs and then garnering the attention of the authorities and the civil society as well as the people around by showcasing the video. Unlike Documentary videos that sometimes capture stories to showcase them to the world, a participatory Video is made to garner attention to a community and the issues faced by them. R. Arun Kumar and P.Govindaraju (2011) state that “as a catalyst PV works as a catalyst for groups to develop the power to interact and influence those bodies and institutions with power over. Video breaks the illiteracy barrier and facilitates the access to the institutional and political framework. The objectives of participatory video are to facilitate empowerment, community self-sufficiency, and communication.” While initially it used to be video films, today, YouTube, the OTT platform provides space, ease, economic feasibility and convenience to easily upload videos  and reach out seeking help or bring attention to their concerns.

One of the most prominent and popular examples of participatory communication is the example of Donald Snowden who teamed up with filmmaker Colin Low to make 27 short films documenting the life and the struggles faced by the fishing community of the Fogo Island, Newfoundland, Canada. The video made by them in a collaborative effort with the people of the community led to many measures being taken to solve the community issues.

 

3.4   ICTs lead to transformation for a good cause

Samkha Village in the Lampang Province of Thailand in its earlier days, had lot of issues, logging led to forest damage which further caused drought and lack of drinking water in summer, followed by flash floods that damaged the paddy fields, which is the primary source of food and income for the people there. Forest fires caused by the villagers while hunting lead to further harm. A teacher, ‘Srinaun Wongtrakul’ and her six students who attended a workshop funded by local and international organizations on community learning initiatives, changed the scenario. It was a learner- oriented programme and gradually with the help of Information and communication technologies, and many reports that went back and forth, the village saw many projects being implemented like check dams, firebreaks, credit unions and information and technology centres to cater to this simple village. Here too a Mobile GAP assessment system was used and children from the Samkhya village’ elementary school were also trained to use “computers and tablets for data inputting and certification application purposes”. The crop production began faring well and water levels too were restored. The parents also depended on their children for data entries, the children grew in confidence. (FAO, 2015)

 

3.5   Community Radio- a beacon in the dark

Gurgaon Ki Awaaz is a community Radio venture that began in 2008 initiated by the NGO ‘The Restoring Force’. The radio plays folk songs of the people of that locality. They reach out to the people of this community in such a way, that the Community Radio station has turned into a mediator between the Government officials and the village. People call the Community Radio for help even for matters such as Bad roads. The Radio teamed up with the internationally acclaimed Sesame group to teach children of migrant workers values and hygiene. The Radio station trains and employs people belonging to the community. Community Learning Programmes like the ‘Chahat Chowk’ focussing on sexual and reproductive health, ‘We The People Abhiyaan’ ‘a 13-part series on the Preamble to the Indian Constitution involving lawyers and social activists, adolescent emotional health programs and other programs on gender- based violence, sexual harassment and gender identity. People call the Radio station, clarify their doubts, even chat with them in a very friendly manner. (Gurgaon Ki Awaaz)

 

3.6   Folk Media- a powerful medium amidst villagers

Dhananjay a pathologist, while traveling back to his village for practice met with an accident. While in the hospital many of the villagers visited him, highlighting the worsening water crisis and deteriorating land conditions in his village. 

In his attempt to do something for the people of his village. He visited other villages to find out techniques of the Watershed Management Programme. Dhananjay stated that he took the help of kirtankars (a community of spiritual storytellers who use dance and songs to convey a message) and tamasha artists (folk dancers and artists) to convey the message and create awareness. They held over 150- 200 events around the village and even visited schools, public events and households with a small television to showcase the importance of the environmental conservation. Videos were made as the results bore fruit and water conversation began. This attracted publicity towards the village and many youngsters joined the cause. The video having been shown on television also brought the attention of the Government and Trust Bodies who granted funds for the project.  The Farmers who could barely grow one crop and had started migrating away, today are able to produce multiple crops (Nitnaware, 2021). These are many instances wherein media initiatives have turned into beacons in the dark.

 

4.   Conclusion

Success Stories are many. However, it is to be remembered that Media alone cannot lead to development. It is team work and the use of proper communication tools. And Media is an undeniably important tool today that aids development initiatives. In a world that is bound by technology, media networking can work wonders across the world today, especially amidst people who are in dire need.

It is inevitable that we use vivid Means of Communication to adapt behaviours and attitudes that lead to a Development that is holistic and involves both the development of Humankind in union with Nature.

 

REFERENCES

 

1.      Be Brasil, 2021, Farming in the digital age- Using digital connectivity to revolutionise traditional farming and agribusiness across Brazil, BBC Capitol, http://www.bbc.com/storyworks/capital/brazil-where-else/agritech-brazil

2.      Colle Royal, 2002, Threads of Development Communication. In: SERVAES, J. (ed.), Approaches to Development Communication, Chapter 6, Paris: UNESCO, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/approaches_to_development_communication.pdf

3.      Colussi Joana, August 10, 2020, Research Shows the Profile of Brazilian Digital Agriculture During the Pandemic, Farm Policy News, Illinois,  https://farmpolicynews.illinois.edu/2020/08/research-shows-the-profile-of-brazilian-digital-agriculture-during-the-pandemic/

4.      Fogo Island Inn, The Fogo Process, https://fogoislandinn.ca/our-island/the-fogo-process/

5.      Hernández-Ramos, P., & Schramm, W. (1989). Development Communication: 1. History and Theories. In E. Barnouw (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Communications. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press/Annenberg School of Communications, University of Pennsylvania, Vol. 2, 9-12.

6.      History of Gurgaon Ki Awaaz, Gurgaon ki awaaz 107.8 FM, https://www.gurgaonkiawaaz.in/about/history/

7.      Kumar Arun R. and Govindaraju P., 2011, The role of Participatory Video in empowering different communities in Participatory Development, PPT presentation on authorSTREAM, http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/vsundarraman-1390998-the-role-of-participatory-video-in-empowering/

8.      Mckinsey &Company, July 16, 2020, Brazilian farmers' approach to digital: Embracing digital, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/agriculture/our-insights/brazilian-farmers-approach-to-digital

9.      Nitnaware Himanshu, May 28, 2021, Maharashtra Man Beats Drought to Revive 400 Hectares, Makes Village Tanker-Free, The Better India Community, https://www.thebetterindia.com/255789/revive-grasslands-maharashtra-lamkani-village-save-water-conservation-dhananjay-newadkar-paani-foundation-environment-him16/

10.  Quebral, Nora (2001), Development Communication in a Borderless World, Paper presented at the national conference-workshop, ‘New Dimensions, Bold Decisions’, University of the Philippines Los Baños, pp. 15–28.

11.  Success Stories on Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture and Rural Development, Ed. Gerard Sylvester, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, 2015

12.  Singh Tanaya, November 17, 2017, Here’s How a Simple Phone Call From You Can Change Thousands of Lives, The Better India Community,  https://www.thebetterindia.com/121295/cgnet-swara-phone-call-shubhranshu-choudhary/

 

Wednesday, 21 July 2021

Propaganda And Propoganda Theory

 

 

 

Propaganda And Propaganda Theory

Study for Undergraduate Students

 

 

Propaganda


Propaganda is a term that is often used pejoratively to denote any idea, opinion or information that is biased or misleading in order to influence the minds of the masses or their opinions to garner a response that supports the intention of the one who wishes to propogate the message.  The term has been defined in the following ways:

 

Definition of the Term

 “Propaganda is a form of communication that attempts to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propogandist. Persuasion is interactive and attempts to satisfy the needs of both persuader and pursuadee. A model of propaganda depicts how elements of informative and persuasive communication may be incorporated into propagandistic communication.” (Jowett and O’Donnell, 2012)

The word ‘Propaganda’ can be defined basically as any opinion, idea or means of information, that is one sided, biased or misleading in nature in order to influence the opinion of the people or the masses at large (Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary).

The dictionary of Oxford Languages highlights that the word, ‘Propaganda’ could also mean “information that could be biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause or Point of view” (Oxford Languages).

 

Etymology of the term ‘Propaganda’

The Word can be basically traced to 1622 where the “Congregatio de Propaganda Fide (Congregation for propagating the Faith) was established by the Catholic Church. The word was derived from the Latin term, ‘Propagare’ which meant ‘to propogate’, ‘to sow’, ‘set forward’, ‘spread’, ‘increase’. It was basically a term used by the Catholic Church in the context of propagating faith or spreading the faith and opposing Protestantism. However, the modern use of this terminology is traced to the time around the year 1929, during the World War I where it was used to indicate information propagated to advance a cause and did not have negative connotations (etymonline.com). The later use however turned Pejorative and also indicated the meaning of ‘propagation of a message’, or ‘spreading a message using deceit, mind control’ and psychological impact. In the long run, it has also been associated to ‘Spin and News Management’ (Jowett and O’Donnell, 2012) an activity often associated with the field of Public Relations.

In the field of Mass Communication, one of the Communication Scholars who did massive work in this field is Harold Lasswell. The book written by him, titled ‘Propaganda Technique in the World War’ highlighted how in the case of a war, it must be made to appear to the people that they are fighting a “menacing, murderous Aggressor”. Lasswell (1927) further stated, “If the propagandist is to mobilize the hate of the people, he must see to it that everything is circulated which establishes the guilt of the enemy” (Patrick and Thrall, 2007). Lasswell’s Model with the 5 W’s was also a Linear model which highlighted the message being sent to the recipient and creating an impact. It was linear and had not feedback. IT was basically a model that had a similar conceptualisation where Mass media was used as a tool to create an impact by passing on messages. Many Theories of Communication revolved around studies based on this thought.

Over a period of years, the term Propaganda was defined by renowned scholar, Edward S. Herman in these words- “The propaganda system allows the U.S. leadership to commit crimes without limit and with no suggestion of misbehaviour or criminality.”

Jowett and O’Donnell, (2012) rightly state the definition of the term Propaganda as the act of “conveying an ideology to an audience with a related objective. Whether it is a government agency attempting to instil a massive wave or patriotism in a national audience to support a war effort, a terrorist network enlisting followers in a jihad, a military leader trying to frighten the enemy by exaggerating the strength of its army, a corporation pursuing a credible image to maintain its legitimacy among its clientele, or a company seeking to malign a rival to deter competition for its product, a careful and determined plan of prefabricated symbol manipulation is used to communicate an objective to an audience”. Many other scholars, have attempted at defining the term Propaganda, in view of their scenario.

The term therefore has been used both in the context of a theory and a model. The Older perspective is that of the Classical Propaganda Theory. The later version is the perspective put forth by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, in their book the Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media and is termed as the ‘Propaganda Model’.

 

The Classical Propaganda Theory

 

Among one of the popular theories that is associated by some researchers is the rhetoric theory by Aristotle, wherein a speaker enlightens and persuades his audience and convinces them through the use of Rhetoric. Pedro-Carañana, J., Broudy, D. and Klaehn, J. (eds.) (2018) state that “Aristotle developed a systematic analysis of rhetoric as the art of persuasion, arguing that rhetoric had often been used to manipulate emotions, hide crucial facts, and seek to convince the other party of ideas and concepts contrary to their own interests, but which could also be developed into modes of persuasion based upon philosophical knowledge for enlightenment and the common good”.

The initial Classical ‘Propoganda Theory’ is also derived from the ‘Hegemonic Theory’ which consisted of the word propaganda being used to address the ideas of the ruler, ruling class or the elite, or aristocrats being perpetrated to the ordinary masses in a subtle manner. The initiation of the Propaganda and persuasion theories could also be traced post the French Revolution and the hailing of the Industrialisation, wherein Propaganda theory led to the understanding that the Dominant classes continued to be Dominant despite the development as their ideas were only being perpetrated to the masses with subtleness.  The masses continued to be dominated and ruled by the elite and were victims of the consumeristic trends and idea that were perpetrated to make the rich get richer.

Antonio Gramsci (1971), stated that the ruling elites were able to exercise noncoercive dominance through the use of symbols communicated through cultural institutions such as school and the mass media (Patrick and Thrall, 2007). In other words, “Propaganda and mis-education would serve as the principal tools in re-engineering the desires and tastes of a largely rural, self-organised and cooperative population and presenting to it a specific form of industrialisation centred around a system of wage-labour promoted by the aristocratic State, bankers, and other corporate leaders.” (Pedro-Carañana, Broudy,and Klaehn, 2018)

The entire concept of the Propaganda Theory today could be interpreted as the Government-Press Media Nexus in terms of the government’s ability to channelise information being passed on to the people through filters created by the Government themselves in order to propogate their opinion or a certain opinion in their favour. The masses are considered to be naive and partially informed. They are also generally considered to be people who need simplified explanation at the cost of accuracy, which often promulgates the ruling authority to maximise their influence on the thought process of the masses. However, scholars across the world have highlighted that people will buy any opinion by the ruler only if the ruler sell content that people want to buy. This is the crux that lies below Hegemonical Practices. The people are made to believe that a given ‘idea, opinion or piece of Information’ is absolutely necessary for a better living through massive use of perpetrating these messages through mass media as a tool, thus garnering support for the rulers who actually propagated the concept.

 

The Propaganda Model by Herman and Chomsky

 

In the model prescribed by E. Herman and N. Chomsky media serve booth as a tool that performs the functions of amusing, entertaining, informing and as a system that inculcates individuals with “with the values, beliefs, and codes of behaviour that will integrate them into the institutional structures of the larger society”. Both the Experts highlight how in an attempt to avoid major conflicts that could stem from class interest, media is used for systematic propaganda to propogate the values of the dominant elite. (Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky in the excerpts from the Book Manufacturing Consent)

Chomsky and Herman also add that in many countries power ultimately lies in the hands of the State Bureaucracy which gives them a monopolistic control over the media arena, further confirming to the media system’s succumbing to the dominant Elite. Furthermore, they point out that even when Media critiques and exposes “corporate and governmental malfeasance”, the critique is still narrowed down and filtered before publishing.

Herman and Chomsky’s model focusses on how money and power which are at the disposal of the State Bureaucracy and Corporates leads to filtering of the news fit to print, marginalising of dissent, and the permeation of messages which are suitable to the palate of the government and dominant private interests to the public. The model categorises

(I)                  “The size, concentrated ownership, owner wealth, and profit orientation of the dominant mass-media firms;

(II)                Advertising as the primary income source of the mass media;

(III)              The reliance of the media on information provided by government, business, and "Experts" funded and approved by these primary sources and agents of power;

(IV)              "Flak" as a means of disciplining the media; and

(V)                "Anticommunism" as a national religion and control mechanism.

These elements interact with and reinforce one another. The raw material of news must pass through successive filters, leaving only the cleansed residue fit to print. They fix the premises of discourse and interpretation, and the definition of what is newsworthy in the first place, and they explain the basis and operations of what amount to propaganda campaigns.” (Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky in the excerpts from the Book Manufacturing Consent)

 

 

 

REFERENCES

 


1.       Brian A. Patrick and A. Trevor Thrall, Beyond Hegemony: Classical Propaganda Theory and Presidential Communication Strategy After the Invasion of Iraq, Mass Communication & Society, 2007, 10(1), 95–118, DOI:10.1080/15205430709337006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205430709337006

2.       Cambridge advanced Learners Dictionary and Thesaurus, dictionary.cambridge.org

3.       Edward Herman & Noam Chomsky, A Propaganda Model- Excerpted from Manufacturing Consent, 1988, https://chomsky.info/consent01/

4.       Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon, 1988, 2002.

5.       Gart S. Jowett and Victoria O’Donnell, 2012, Propaganda and Persuasion, 5th Edition, Sage Publications, UK

6.       Lasswell H. D, 1927, Propaganda technique in the World War, p.47, New York: Knopf.

7.       Propaganda, Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com/word/propaganda

8.       Pedro-Carañana, J., Broudy, D. and Klaehn, J. (eds.). 2018. The Propaganda Model Today: Filtering Perception and Awareness. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book27. License: CC‐BY‐NC‐ND 4.0