Wednesday, 10 April 2019

Rural Journalism - Notes for BJMC


Rural Journalism in the Indian context


The term ‘Rural Journalism’ is basically meant to define journalism that addresses issues in the rural pockets of India. These issues include coverage of rural news that deals with farmers, tribals, the economically backward in rural areas, agrarian issues both good and those that need to be addressed, agrarian crisis, socio-economic inequalities that exist in rural India, issues that deal with industrialisation that deprives people of their land and their basic rights in the rural pockets, etc,. Rural reports by journalists can contribute massively to development of Indian rural areas and can lead to Governments taking notice of the situation and reaching out with helps to these pockets.

A very ideal example is that which was given in the Hindu 'Business line' online paper wherein a story is mentioned about Basheer Ahmed Peer. The article says, “Rural reporting had the same kind of effect yet again when young writer Basheer Ahmed Peer drew the attention of the world to the harrowing experience of the people of Shumaryal village in Kupwara who were daily forced to cross a makeshift bridge of tree logs and wooden planks. During floods, crossing this bridge became that much riskier for school-going children, as well as the elderly population. Peer’s story spurred the State government to build a proper bridge, making life so much easier for the villagers.”[1] This was the effect of Rural Reporting. Journalism can work wonders if it begins to stand for the rights of the people.

The same article further states the benefits of Rural journalism by saying that “Other rural reports have also led to schools and toilets being constructed where there was none. Widows who were reduced to begging have got their pension and supply of medicines to a remote public health centre in Salotree, in Poonch, was restored. At Manghar village of Poonch district, where many lives were lost due to lack of transport, Bashart ul Haque’s article fetched an ambulance service to the region. That’s the kind of empowerment rural journalism is making possible.”[2]

Alternative media and Rural Journalism


Another sign of hope for Rural Journalism is of certain alternative media like Khabar Lahariya, Janavani, Gaon Connection, PARI are striving to serve the purpose of rural journalism in India. These are all medias that cater to Rural journalism at the grassroots level. 

Khabar Lahariya identifies itself solely as a rural media. It highlights the fact that it provides of those news stories and reports which are not highlighted by mainstream news channels. It does the hardcore job of searching the truth about schemes that are introduced and the mannerism in which they are practiced. 

Janavani, a newspaper, was initiated in 2004, to highlight the issues of the rural poor in Orissa and had addressed varied issues of corruption, primary school education, sanitation, status of women, child rights, rights of the indigenous and the Dalits, etc. This was another initiative to highlight the problems in the rural areas which did not find coverage in main stream media.

Social Media and Rural Journalism

Certain Social Media forums are now taking the trouble of atleast contributing a few articles on Rural journalism. Social media news forums like 'The Quint' have journalists who travel to different corners of India. There are other Social media outlets that help circulate the demands of those suffering in the rural areas. However, these are very few and their intentions not very clear.


Rural Journalism in today's context


However, Rural journalism seems to be receding in India. While local newspapers do provide local news. Rural areas are often not covered  by mainstream media, be it the English newspapers or the numerous news channels broadcasted as main stream media. 

One reason for Rural areas not being covered is that they are hard to reach and cost the media houses a good deal of money to pay the journalist and his travels. Rural areas are often deprived of resources like electricity, health, sanitation, education and even their basic rights of housing and food. Malnutrition is high in many rural pockets. Medication is a luxury in these pockets as people have to travel kilometers to access a hospital. 

Even in today's arena, where mobile technology has developed, many interior places do not have towers and one has to walk a distance to get some network to be able to communicate. Some remote villages in places like Uttarakhand are being abandoned as development has barely trickled in those areas. Travelling to such places hold a lot of challenge and many media houses with their corporatised scenario that focuses on increasing profits, do not aim to provide news such as these.

Journalism today, is mostly done in the precincts of city offices and are often fed news by news agencies. A few local newspapers do carry local stories. Certain channels find extremely silly stories to garner TRP ratings, which by itself is a gimmickry to gain advertisement revenue and is itself faulty.

Journalism in India which was meant to be watchdog, has turned into a ‘Couch’ Dog journalism, where journalists barely travel out of their office, and those who do are very few. Most are involved in lapdog journalism appeasing the politicians and Corporate firms who have invested in their channels. For the rest, they debate vociferously with various politicians, and civil society members to reach the ultimate aim of a debate very often pre-decided as to in whose favour the questions should be raised. The worst scenario that has started as a trend is the aspect of Pretentious photo and video shoot of Politicians, who to garner votes travel by rich cars and helicopters to rural areas, click themselves feeding the poor or working in the fields with them as part of their publicity stunt and return back to their rich domains after getting media coverage. There are very few channels, especially the English channels that actually cater to rural news. And if they do, it is very rare.

Most leading National news channels have very few on-foot journalists who go to interior pockets to cover issues. In most cases, these rural beats are not covered at all as rural journalists barely exist. 

However, there are international channels that do cover certain Rural news from across the world, These news stories are not just about rural areas, they also relate to human interest stories. Channels like Al Jazeera have highlighted these stories from around the globe.

P Sainath and Rural Journalism


In India, Journalist P Sainath is considered to be the Father of Rural journalism. 

He has these words to say, “You see it in the simplest and most direct way: the organisation of beats. Many beats have become extinct. Take the labour correspondent: when labour issues are covered at all, they come under the header of Industrial Relations, and they’re covered by business correspondents. That means they’re covered by the guy whose job is to walk in the tracks of corporate leaders, and who, when he deigns to look at labour, does it through the eyes of corporate leaders. Now find me the agriculture columnist – in most newspapers, the idea doesn’t exist anymore. If you lack correspondents on those two beats, you’re saying 70 per cent of the people in this country don’t matter, I don’t want to talk to them.”[3] In other words, P Sainath has pointed out how rural journalism on broadcast media and traditional media has drastically diminished.

Santosh Kumar Biswal says, “It is quite apparent that rural journalism remains a grey area in Indian journalism. Journalists working in urban areas are not nuanced enough to understand and report rural problems. The paucity of reporters at grassroots level, less space or time allocation, and shoddy newsroom management have further damaged rural journalism.”[4]

It was a relentless effort by Sainath some years back to cover thousands of kilometres by various means of transport including walking for long distances, to cover stories from, five extremely backward rural pockets of India. This was precisely at a time, when the economic reforms led by Manmohan Singh, an economist of very high calibre brought about a dynamic change in India’s economic history leading to a growth in urbanisation. Which further meant that Journalism, especially News Journalism began covering urban issues. Economic prosperity and added challenges due to the growth in magazines and their writings further challenged the Newspapers to revamp themselves to add customers which mean to newspapers resorting to cover elite lifestyles.

It was at this point of time, that journalists like P Sainath contributed massively to bring news reports of the real India in the rural pockets which most papers did not wish to cover due to expenses involved. He worked for the ‘Times group’ for a brief period while doing those articles.  He set an example with his stories which are evident in his popular book, ‘Everybody loves a good drought.’ His writings pose a challenge to the current journalists and media houses of today, who fail to cover most of the news in Rural pockets.

Santosh Kumar Biswal in his article ‘Rural journalism in a shambles’ in ‘The Statesman’, writes that “The reportage that romanticises farmers’ suicides has now become passé in India. The role of media as the harbinger of new ideas for rural development is yet to be pragmatically explored and sensed. Unfortunately, the empowering role of journalism has been weakened as priority is being given to making profits. Often news is commoditized and manufactured. Bad practices of journalism are driving away the good. Growing skewed proportion in terms of production, distribution and consumption of news between rural news consumers and urban consumers is widening. Who is to be blamed for the precarious condition of rural journalism in India? ”[5]

Conclusion 


It is a known fact that a majority of our people are from the rural areas. While there are local newspapers that cover news. The mainstream channels have failed to cater to rural news and address the problems of the rural population. Rural journalism does get a boost through Social media when a particular news goes viral. However, alt media needs to be boosted. Rural journalism that can question the inadequacy of schemes and highlight the plight of rural citizens needs to find space on mainstream media. This should be made mandatory as part of development journalism by the Government. 

Media can become watchdogs and help the government to reach out and transform our villages for the better through the noble service they can render through Rural journalism. The Government should also permit genuine Social media websites catering to Rural news to work as NGOs providing them help to uplift the society around them by showcasing their issues and also providing the news of what benefits were provided. This will prove as a boon both for the rural areas and the Country.



[1] Usha Rai, The power of rural reporting, December 05, 2014, https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/variety/the-power-of-rural-reporting/article23031352.ece, downloaded on April 9, 2019.
[2] Usha Rai, The power of rural reporting, December 05, 2014, https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/variety/the-power-of-rural-reporting/article23031352.ece, downloaded on April 9, 2019.
[3] "Interview with Raghu Karnad in Outlook Magazine". Outlookindia.com. Retrieved 29 November 2011.
[4] Santosh Kumar Biswal, Rural journalism in a shambles, Pune, December 2, 2018 11:47 am, https://www.thestatesman.com/opinion/rural-journalism-shambles-1502712969.html
[5] Santosh Kumar Biswal, Rural journalism in a shambles, Pune, December 2, 2018 11:47 am, https://www.thestatesman.com/opinion/rural-journalism-shambles-1502712969.html

Tuesday, 9 April 2019

JOURNALISM AND GLOBALISATION IN THE INDIAN CONTEXT


JOURNALISM AND GLOBALISATION

Technological advancement has led to massive changes in the way journalism occurs today. Mass Communication propelled by the arrival of Digital technology, instant data transfer due to the Internet, the new media and the Social networking forums have brought in massive changes in the arena of journalism. News travels fast. News has become globalised, especially due to the internet. Given the fact that most media houses are today run by Corporates, International and Transnational Institutions, Individuals with high share of investments, one cannot deny the complexity in the web of transactions that is occurring on a day to day basis at both national and international levels.

Globalisation has contributed to massive changes in the flow of information. Journalism cannot be explained today without linking it to the influence of Globalisation. The new interconnectivity due to the digital revolution and the speed at which information is passed has massively transformed the way journalism occurs. As rightly put by Stephen Reese, “The globalization of journalism occurs through a multitude of levels, relationships, social actors, and places, as they combine to create new public spaces.”[1] (Reese, 2010)


  1. Globalisation, writes Splichal, denotes the formation of a global system composed of a variety of combinations among national, international and transnational institutions, corporations, associations, individuals and other groupings, and refers broadly to the increased complexity and interdependency of societies due to all kinds of transactions across national borders, enabled by information, communication and transportation technologies “but not simply triggered by them”.[2] (Igor Vobic)
  2. Global connections support new forms of journalism, which create politically significant new spaces within social systems, lead to social change, and privilege certain forms of power. [3] (Reese, 2010)
  3. In simple words, the Globalisation phenomena in relation to Journalism indicates the formation of a complex communication system at the world level due to the interaction between national, international, transnational, institutions, news agencies, corporations and Individuals. The use of Global media basically means media employed by multinational corporations that cater to reach out to audiences globally. Herman and McChesney say that ‘Global media’ have been variously defined as those having a global reach or in being owned by global transnational corporations (Herman and McChesney, 1997).[4]

It is a known factor in India that owning a media channel in India is no more a one individual entity, it is a complex business transaction of various stakeholders whose needs are catered to simultaneously in the current scenario. Traditional media can no more remain with the one-way perspective and has to make itself and has made itself relevant by becoming digital. This has been largely witnessed with newspaper turning to web, digital and social media platforms to run the race, stay relevant and garner audiences who will read content. Media houses have turned into multi-dimensional, cross media conglomerates who cater to varied audiences through Traditional, Broadcast and New media across the world due to accessibility. A news that is aired in India via different channels can get picked up by countries abroad, due to the permeating digital technology and new media forums that have made them accessible. It is easier today for channels to have transactions with other channels to borrow news footage or news snippets due to transaction possibilities midst business corporations.

However, the one popular statement by Marshal Mcluhan that the world there is becoming ‘a global village’ by might not be a complete fact. There is indeed a plethora of information that is transmitted due to technological advancement, however the concept of Global village, speaks of a unison in the consumption of data that is provided and a similarity in the style in which the data is made for consumption for the world at large. This seems to be a far-fetched idea. Despite the varied amount of information transaction, journalism which has developed in a technological approach by leaps and bounds is very much a product of local culture, in the Indian context. In India, the local languages still continue to hold popularity whether it be print, broadcast or Social networking forums. The situation replicates in different countries while catering to their own masses.

While, there is a massive flow of information that occurs due to satellite television, Internet and Digital technology, the information before reaching masses goes through the process of massive gatekeeping, coloured and presented in a style and format that appeals to the audience or the recipient of this information especially in the case of traditional and Broadcast media. Thus, there are varied perspectives of Globalisation effects on journalism which need to be studied while discussing this topic.

 MEDIA GLOBALISATION:  Historical perspectives

CONTEXTUALIZING THE FOUR THEORIES OF THE PRESS 

Historically, there have been various theories that have contributed to the study of Journalism and Globalisation. These include the Four theories of the press and the Modernisation Theory that has been a part of Journalism and Mass Communication studies for ages. The Four theories of the Press popularised four dimensions of Journalistic practices that were being followed in various parts of the World. In the aftermath of various changes that have occurred in different parts of the world including wars, political skirmishes, Divisions and turmoil, the theories have to re-interpreted and re-drafted for today’s world.

While, The Authoritarian theory, The Libertarian theory, The Soviet Communist theory and The Social Responsibility theory provided an explanation of media functioning at a given point of time, but have today turned out to be merely a part of historical Data with barely little relevance in today’s technological scenario according to many scholars. Igor Vobic says that the “Four Theories of the Press, which became a landmark study of journalism through broader societal prisms for the next forty years, but, over the last decade or so, has been widely accused of theoretical shallowness and unsubstantial conceptual uniformity in its generalisations on media, society and cross-national dynamics.”[5]  This holds true to many parts of the world including India. Media in India initially was an embodiment of Self Responsibility and a Democratic tool working as a fourth pillar that kept the other three pillars of the judiciary, the executive and the legislature in check. However, the Broadcast media was always  a tool of the government as it was considered a public broadcasting service in India in its initial stages. Its privatisation of media that led to commercialisation and globalisation of Indian media. So, the model of the Four theories needs to be re- read in the light of the Indian Context. While Social Responsibility with Self Regulation has always been the underlying factor for Print media, Broadcast was initially a puppet of the Government, and continues to be so in the case of National Broadcast media like Doordarshan, LokSabha TV, Rajya Sabha TV, and the All India Radio (Aakashvani) na dthe FM channels run by Prasar Bharti. With the dawn of Privatisation and commercialisation, Slef Regulation and Ethics, Accountability and Objectivity of News has become questionable over a period of years. Thus, in the Indian context, one needs to re-define a new theory that suits the situation.

MODERNISATION PERSPECTIVES

The Four theories of the Press Model was followed by the modernisation perspective which expected a westernised style of development model and the use of Mass media to perpetrate such a model which did not take into consideration the existing wisdom of the land. It was considered to be a kind of Americanisation of media and media content that was unidirectional. However, As Igor Vobic rightly puts it, “Since the 1980s and 1990s, the centralised dynamics of change across local boundaries, facilitated by fuzzy concepts of Americanisation or Westernisation, have been criticised by the counter argument that global flows are “multidirectional” and that the simple image of Western political, economic and cultural domination obscures the complexity, reciprocity and unevenness of its interaction between local and global . [6]

The same can be spoken about the Indian continent. In India, although the initial experiment of Television was initiated with a high amount of scepticism and a strict control on the airing of programmes which were mostly educational and gradually transformed into a means to educate, reform and transform due to projects like the Kheda project which were initiated by Vikram Sarabhai (a scientist) and his vision. The concept of Journalism was viewed as a respected profession, especially due to the role of traditional media in the freedom struggle. This was followed by a period of proliferation of the Press and media as it turned profitable due to Advertisement revenue and an increase in readers. Despite the curbs that were initiated during Emergency and war, Journalists proved it time and again, that media was the fourth pillar in Democracy. It was only in the late 80’s and early 90’s that commercialisation stepped in and television was transformed.

The arrival of the cable TV did temporarily lead to a lot of western content gaining popularity which acknowledged the modernisation theory. However, this was not for long as India found its own local cable and satellite content through the commercial channel Zee which transformed the scenario. This commercialisation of not just tele programmes and entertainment reached the limits when Private News channels with large local and international investments were permitted to air news. This was the step by step beginning of a globalised approach. The entire process which initially saw Globalisation as an influence of content that is westernised gradually got transformed into glocalised content. Content was made palatable to the Indian audiences. That brings us to a sub topic in the phenomenon of globalisation and that is Glocalisation.

GLOCALISATION


Global village leads to an idea of Homogenised content. However, this not the fact. Most content is not homogenised, rather it is domesticated, which has led to the rise of the term Glocalisation. There are many globally popular channels that run their local versions in India. For instance BBC Hindi, CNN IBN, etc.

‘Glocalization,’ a popular concept in this literature, can be seen not as the inevitable interplay between local and cultural forces from a distance, but as the uniform imposition of a global (village) standard across a range of local circumstances. These interpretations, however, obscure the real complexity of globalization.[7]

While Stephen Reese says that “The impact of globalization on news in India, when understood as glocalization, can be interpreted as a set of practices in which the local media have absorbed the global, rejuvenated the local, and given audiences possibilities of strengthening democratic discourses.”[8] However, true this might be in case of Print Media and certain Social Media platforms like Blogs, It may not be a fact with regard to Broadcast Media. Indeed, India is a democratic country and much of Print Media still holds up the values, but Broadcast Media in most cases has succumbed to the pressures of Capitalism.

India has a hub of channels where content is glocalised in multiple languages and packaged aptly catering to what the audience wants (not what the audience needs) based on the socio-cultural practices of the place or state in which it is being aired.

Glocalisation and the Indian Scenario

Media in most places follows the same perspective. It is often designed to cater to the people of the place. News picked up from any corner of the World when reported in Indian media is often given the Indian twist. Often in today’s arena, news journalism caters to the advertisers, Politicians and the corporates. News Journalists have become a prey to subjective Journalism choosing the voice of their sponsors and their own personal biases over factual and accountable information. The interference of Politicians in India has turned many media channels into news promoters of particular parties who sponsor them. Information flow of Global news is very poor in national news channels. Global news has been reduced to a very brief mention of particular issues of chosen countries after gate keeping. In most cases, Journalists in India have been accused of cantankerous debates, dramatization of issues, especially those involving neighbouring countries like Pakistan, and bowing down to political pressures. The term ‘Godi’ media a term to indicate lapdog journalism has been framed in Hindi for many national news channels.

Satellite television however, is a boon for Globalisation with a multiple number of channels that can be accessed makes available counter-flow news information with the availability of channels like Al Jazeera and BBC. Many Indian National TV news journalists and news channels have been accused of reducing News journalism to debates based on twitter statements or statements made by politicians against each other. In a few cases of National catastrophes like floods or other major issues are journalists sent to cover up stories. On foot journalists have been reduced to a bare minimum to reduce expenses of many news Channels. It is has become a child’s game to identify which political party a particular journalist supports in the manner in which news stories get covered and narrated.

Global news is mostly available on Digitised and Internet platforms. And those with easy access to the internet can read the same. But this doesn’t apply to a major portion of the country who are from rural pockets.  Furthermore, those accessing news, access local channels and local languages. Thus Global news is a very rare occurrence on Indian news channels, which barely cover the news from India itself. Albeit the fact that International news that could affect international policies relating to India, the Trips by the Prime Minister to varied countries, etc does find space on our channels and so does News that includes gross murders, blasts and threats. But these are usually time framed into small snippets.

Sting operations by Social Media journalists who have a social media platform called Cobrapost have also revealed how major cross media conglomerates were willing to compromise their news content for a huge sum of cash. Instances such as these have wrecked the standards of journalism, the content generation and the authentic flow of intelligent news.

News channels have also brought various infotainment means including debates mingled with Quawwalis ( an Indian art form of music) where along with the politicians, two teams of Quawwali musicians debate in song supporting each party.  Cartoons that highlight political situation are also popular. News journalists in some local channels have gone to varied heights to dramatize news. This was seen in the latest Pulwama incident. Where news rooms on certain channels were made to look like war rooms and journalists dressed in soldier uniforms presented news. A gross mockery of the incident which received a huge amount of flak from the citizens of the country.

CONCLUSION


Domestication and Glocalisation is today an accepted phenomenon. And, the same applies for other countries as Stephen Reese says, “Certainly, the foreign news most people receive, even about big international events, is domesticated through the national journalistic lens. Indeed, international reporting, as a key component of the would-be global public sphere, flunks Hafez’s ‘global test,’ incurring the same criticisms others have levelled for years at national journalism: elite-focused, conflictual, and sensational, with a narrow, parochial emphasis. If ‘global’ means giving ‘dialogic’ voices a chance to speak to each other without reproducing national ethnocentrism, then the world’s media still fail to measure up.” (Reese, 2010)[9]

Globalisation and journalism are thus interconnected but with various dimensions that make it a complex phenomenon to explain in a consistent limited vocabulary. Globalisation is easier defined within the precincts of Information and Communication Technology wherein, news journalism is easily accesible on the Internet. And countries can access news channels and news from varied corners of the earth due to the internet. However, this information doesn't guarantee a complete understanding of news as the interpretations differ depending the politico- socio -cultural understanding of people. However, in the content of Broadcast media, one has to note that most national and local news channels, domesticate the news. Those international channels which can be accessed due to the cable and dish antenna are the alt source of news that permeate a global reach and a globalised information process.



[1] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[2] Igor Vobic, Editorial Open Access Journalism and Globalisation: Paradigms, Problems, Prospects,
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/journalism-and-globalisation-paradigms-problems-prospects-2165-7912.1000e123.php?aid=6472, Downloaded on 15-03-2019
[3] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[4] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[5] Igor Vobic, Editorial Open Access Journalism and Globalisation: Paradigms, Problems, Prospects,
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/journalism-and-globalisation-paradigms-problems-prospects-2165-7912.1000e123.php?aid=6472, Downloaded on 15-03-2019
[6] Igor Vobic, Editorial Open Access Journalism and Globalisation: Paradigms, Problems, Prospects,
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/journalism-and-globalisation-paradigms-problems-prospects-2165-7912.1000e123.php?aid=6472, Downloaded on 15-03-2019
[7] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[8] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x
[9] Stephen D. Reese, Journalism and Globalization, Sociology Compass 4/6 (2010): 344–353, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00282.x